• Get in touch
Multiculturalism and the Catholic Church

This is my column in today’s Greenville News.

This was submitted and formatted before the president made his ‘accommodation’ late this week.  We’ll have to see about that.

We live in a society very attentive to multiculturalism, alternative lifestyles and diversity. So why isn’t the ancient and venerable faith and culture of Catholicism considered worth of respect? Catholics make up a huge part of the rich fabric of American history, molding our country in academia, politics, the military, business, theology, art and most importantly, in family life.

In point of fact, if we were multicultural, if we were truly diverse and respectfulof differing viewpoints, it’s likely that at least half of our hospitals would never perform abortions of any sort, since on this topic, Americans are very closely divided. And pro-life is one of the ‘multis’ in multicultural.

Of course, some of those organizations indeed benefit from federal assistance. However, do we really want those groups to stop providing the life-saving and life-changing services they offer, and which the government could in no way replicate?

Probably not, but more to the point, federal assistance should not be allowed to dictate conscience. If it does so, it is perilously close to establishing religious belief on its own. The First Amendment, which prevents establishment of religion as well as preventing government from prohibiting its free practice, might just as easily read ‘shall not establish a mandated philosophy, nor prohibit the philosophy of others.’ Else atheists are not protected, since they have no particular religion while their views are worthy of protection as well as mine.

In light of our regard for some groups, the whole thing seems remarkably confusing. The Department of Homeland Security has been explicitly instructed not to use terminology offensive to our Islamic citizens. Homosexual advocacy groups have the ear of politicians and cultural icons. Immigrant groups are treated with kid gloves, to the extent that one is charged with Fascism merely for suggesting that a person have a photo ID in order to vote. So why this assault on Catholics…on Christians?

I suppose it’s because disregard for religion is the new religion. And those who dare to espouse a relevant faith are simply viewed as nonentities in the political arena. There are many who believe that faith should have no role in politics whatsoever. They are the same who wring their hands with fear that theocracy will be established by people of faith.

In a supreme political irony, to avoid the fantastical fear of totalitarian control, to avoid the whispy threat of a government run explicitly on religious grounds, they squash the very tolerance they all but worship themselves.

It’s all the more ironic that the President has lately used faith to prod us into social action. Jesus himself did call us to social engagement, to reach out to those in need. He called us to ‘render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s.’ But He never suggested any sort of government scheme to do so, except that of the Kingdom of God, and the actions of its citizens, carried on out of love for God and man. In fact, tax collectors seem to have an interesting place in the Gospel, as Jesus calls Matthew and Zaccheus (tax collectors) to be with him and renounce their sins; as Jesus enemies ask why he hangs out with tax collectors and sinners; and as Jesus himself consigns those who don’t listen to the Gospel to the implicitely pejorative category of ‘gentiles and tax collectors.’ (Really, it’s in Matthew 18.)

The President mustn’t disdain Christian doctrine even as he calls on it as a foundation for policy. He should pick one or the other. Respect the Catholic doctrines on the sanctity of life and then the Church, Protestant and Catholic alike, will be more likely to be impressed by his call to action for the poor.

Or he can crush Catholic groups and force them to cooperate or close, but then he should honestly say that his policies are less about Jesus than Marx. The hard left will love it.

A little consistency would be much better evidence of his Christianity than lip service and schizmatic philosophy during election year. Conservatives Christians are often chided for hypocricy when we see armed conflict as acceptable, when we are cruel to homosexuals or other groups. Often the critcism is accurate, and stinging in its truth.

But charges of hypocricy swing both ways. And this time it’s the President himself who needs to step back and reassess his policy, in light of what he purports to be his remarkable faith and his adoration of multiculturalism.

Edwin

Share this:
About the author
Edwin

5 Comments

Godslayer

2012-02-15 17:39:09 Reply

Hey Ed, do you know why the Catholic Church opposes birth control?

Because little boys can’t get pregnant.

Nice to see you sticking up for organized pedophilia, especially of the homosexual variety.

Celexa Birth Injury Attorneys

2012-02-17 18:44:35 Reply

Great article! In this world are a lot of religions, but the message is the same, in my opinion.

Evolution Facts

2012-03-08 10:03:04 Reply

Human decency is not derived from religion. It precedes it. I’m so fed up with religious people saying that morals come from religion!

    Edwinlea

    2012-03-08 14:38:41 Reply

    Well, as an ‘evil theist,’ I agree that humans have a sense of right and wrong, and that it existed before religions were formally codified. But from the theistic view, they were still the result of God’s creation. I understand your point, though. Even places that don’t have formal religion seem to exhibit decency, though it may look vastly different from what it would in more advanced cultures. I think that’s just natural law, the law of God in the heart of man. However, your point is well said. And often, religions exhibit a lot of indecent behavior, so mea culpa. Still, if you look at cultures and nations that have been influenced directly by Christianity and Judaism, or by the Protestant Reformation, you’ll see that those places far higher indexes of freedom, economic growth, literacy, equality and all the other benchmarks of good life than other places. Maybe those of us who adopt religion have certain common genetic traits, so I guess it could be (from a purely mechanistic standpoint), coincidental. But combined with the history of Judaism and Christianity, it seems suspiciously rational to me. I like what Pascal said, that humans were both (I paraphrase) ‘glorious and wretched.’ Made in God’s image and yet fallen; capable of good and evil. At least, that’s how it works in my theology and philosophy. Thanks for commenting.

Roma Lagan

2013-04-13 09:40:29 Reply

I should express my thanks to you just for rescuing me from this sort of a hassle. Just following browsing through the the net and locating proposals that are not productive, I figured my complete life was done. Active minus the strategies to the complications you’ve got resolved by means of your create-up is really a critical scenario, and individuals which may have badly destroyed my job if I hadn’t encountered your web site. That expertise and kindness in taking part in with pretty much almost everything was precious. I don’t know what I would’ve accomplished if I obtained not found this sort of a point like this. I may also at this position glance ahead to my future. Thanks a lot greatly for this specialized and powerful manual. I will not hesitate to propose your website to any particular person who must get suggestions about this concern.

Leave a Comment