Back to work!

Today I’m going back to the emergency department to work.  I’ve been off for two weeks.  I’m thankful for my vacation; it was fantastic.  But going back is always a little, well, dicey.

The first time I walk back into the department after a break, I look at the faces of my co-workers, trying to read them:

‘Does he know about Mrs. Krabowsky?  The patient with the infected toe that he discharged and who became septic and died the next day?’

‘Wow, he doesn’t realize we lost the contract and have to move or work for half pay!’

‘Hey, didn’t we elect Ed to work the full-time night position during our last meeting, the one we had while he was on vacation?’

‘Poor guy, he doesn’t know about the stack of subpoenas in his box from the bus wreck when everyone had subtle cervical spine fractures and were all subsequently paralyzed!’

But it isn’t just the faces.  I worry about the first words:

‘Hi man, welcome back!  Hey, do you remember Mr. Garrity?  Yeah, the one you left with me to discharge because you thought his chest pain wasn’t anything?  Well, turns out they gave you the wrong EKG.  It was the weirdest thing…but I wouldn’t worry about it.  The hospital attorney says he thinks we can settle…’

So it is always with a bit of trepidation that I go back to the ER.  And I also return wondering just how much of my medical education has slipped out of my head during my time off.  Honest doctors must admit that it takes practice to practice well.  No matter how much people in the ivory towers want us to believe that articles and tests make us competent, those are only a smidgen of good medicine.  The rest is seeing people, recognizing sickness and injury, and knowing what to do.

So, for the first 6 hours, I expect my brain to reprogram itself from ‘where can we eat with all four children without donating plasma,’ ‘is that Bison about to charge the rental car,’ and ‘wow it’s a lot more comfortable at 10,000 ft that it is in South Carolina,’ to ‘the head bone’s connected to the neck bone, the neck bone’s connected to the…the…I guess back bone.’  I forget.

I can always tell when I’ve been off.  I see a fracture and call my ortho friends:  ‘Yeah, hey Jim, this guy has a broken, uh, well, you know the little bendy bone at the end of the arm thing, that people break when they, uh,’  (I probably sound like a stoner…’Dude, it’s, broken!’)  My friends hopefully say to themselves, ‘must be back from vacation,’ and look at the x-ray themselves.

But the worst is communicating with patients in my transient ignorance:

‘Well, Dr. Leap, what exactly is a myocardial infarction?’

‘I’m glad you asked, Mr. Fauxpas, because it’s when a blood vessel in your, uh, in your heart gets a narrowing called a, I mean, when you get too much cholesterol or stuff, or a clot and it moves to, um, oh!  I’ve been paged overhead!  I’ll talk to you after your thrombolytic!’

‘What’s a thrombolytic?’

‘Your nurse will explain it all.’

So, I hope that it’s a smooth one.  And I hope the same for anyone returning to their jobs after a long time off.  My God return us to a place where we were scarcely missed, where nothing changed except the smell of the coffee creamer, and where our errors had nothing to do with anyone’s well-being.

Ed

Vacation from information

I apologize to anyone who reads my blog, but my family and I took a long vacation to the West.  We travelled to Denver, and then to Cheyenne, WY, the Black Hills of South Dakota, Mt. Rushmore, Crazy Horse Memorial, Devil’s Tower, The Little Bighorn Battlefield and then to Colorado for three days to visit an uncle in Fairplay.

It was a great trip.  The children learned a lot, and we had a wonderful time camping, driving, visiting museums and all the rest.  (Though the children got a little tired of the ‘junior ranger’ programs at the National Parks, with their required scavenger hunts).

Toward the end of the trip I realized that we had scarcely heard or seen any news.  We followed the tragic story of the miners in Utah a little, and I said some prayers for them and their families.   But on the whole, we didn’t know what was happening outside of our car, our hotel, our tent.

Now, I’m not making an argument for intentional ignorance, but Jan and I agreed that not hearing the news didn’t really change our lives much.  We still cared for each other, still ate and drank, still had clothes on our backs.  We had books to read and things to discuss.  We had God watching over us.  And short of economic, natural or military catastrophe, we weren’t any the less for not hearing the news.  Besides, when we do hear the latest misery, what can we usually do about it?  Nothing but worry, and that isn’t productive at all.
Maybe, in our frantic information age, we would all do well to take a break now and then.  To stay off of the Internet; to leave off the television; to change the radio station when the news comes on.  Maybe we should teach our children that they can get by without a daily dose of misery, pain and worry.  They need to know that if they go a week or a month without the latest casualty counts from Iraq, terror warnings from Washington, guilt-inducing broadcasts over global warming or the most recent suggestion on how to eat only dirt in order to avoid heart disease.

Ignorance isn’t really bliss, I don’t suppose.  But a break from the constant assault of daily news might leave us happier and healthier in the end.

Let the Ocean Wash the Work Away (This week’s Greenville News Column)

Whenever we go on vacation, I realize too late that there are dozens of things to do before leaving. I don’t mean the logistics: buy sunscreen, arrange food for cats and dogs so they don’t eat each other, ensure that all children have footwear and swim-suits, fix pinging/roaring/exploding sound in car. I expect those things. They’re part of the frantic joy of going away.

I’m referring to the things I think I have to do. While I pack my bags and pick my beach reading, I’m thinking over articles and stories I want to write, hospital paperwork I need to finish, e-mails I ‘have to’ answer, appointments I should make, weeds I should cut and all the rest. Before I go on vacation, I’m overwhelmed by what I should do, by what I need to do. In the days leading up to our departure, I’m torn between cleaning my office and writing a story; between paperwork and mowing.

It doesn’t help that I’m a hopeless procrastinator, or that I have unrealistic expectations for my own accomplishments. And it doesn’t help that I usually have to work a night-shift before leaving town, so that when I should be getting ready to leave, I’m actually wandering about the house, confused and sleep-deprived, trying to figure out what I was planning to do with the large piece of PVC pipe I’m holding.

It does help that my wife understands the way I function, or don’t, as the case may be. She sits in the car reading and soothing the children as I finally run out of the house. ‘Leave the PVC behind,’ she says without looking up from her book.

Fortunately, I realize that work doesn’t travel very well. It’s almost impossible (despite i-Phones, laptops and Blackberries) to go to the beach and work when your children look at you, buckets in hand, and say ‘do you want to build a sand-castle?’

Still, I went to the beach last week hoping to accomplish some writing I ‘needed’ to finish. However, little was accomplished. And I’m a better man for it. I finished reading one book. I only wrote a few things that touched me as I sat by the Atlantic. I played in the sand. I held my wife’s hand and flirted with her. The children and I built assorted castles, drew pictures on the sand, constructed a larger-than-life ‘sand monkey’, and looked for shells. We floated on the green, salty swells, and road the breakers until at each bedtime, we fell into deep, oceanic, moon-driven sleeps. We were hypnotized by the seashore.

I love that the beach does this to us. I love that we often arrive in the evening, and walk along the sand in the dark. I love that somehow, the salty, wet wind blows away our normal lives, driving them inland (somewhere near Orangeburg) and leaving something elemental behind. I love that my children become tanned, and their hair lighter; that the waves can make them laugh, even when they are turned upside down and sideways in their grasp, as if the ocean were a playful uncle.

I can’t deny the allure of the ocean. I realize that it isn’t exactly the water, for pools have clear, fresh water and fewer living creatures to brush against, but less appeal. It isn’t exactly the sand, which inhabits every crevice of our bodies (and there are quite a few) for weeks after we leave. And it isn’t just the seafood, which is curiously more expensive as one gets closer to the food’s point of origin.

The ocean and the beach draw us for many reasons, but mainly because they seem to purify us. They leave us looking at an infinity of ocean, in an infinity of sand grains, and recognizing our place. The beach puts us in perspective, and reminds us of how little our projects, our accomplishments, our ‘should’ and ‘musts’ actually matter.

We’ll always try to do too much. It’s the tendency of modern men and women, who are driven to do; who feel compelled to accomplish and prove themselves. It’s how modern life tells us we are defined and validated. By our jobs and our money, our cars and our clothes, our educations, homes and retirement accounts.

But for a while, if we let the beach have us, we can learn how to do something so very rare. We can learn how to simply be. And despite sand-fleas and sunburns, that’s a little taste of heaven on earth.

Dictation gone terribly wrong

I came to work in the emergency department yesterday morning and found taped above our communal desk.  It concerned a chart I had dictated the day before. 

The note, from the transcriptionist, said:

‘If it were possible to rate with a minus, this dictation would warrant it; this dictator clips words, chops off sentences and changes thought direction in mid-sentence, leaving intent to the imagination of the hearer.’

It is, I must admit, an eloquent description of the difficulties the transcriptionist experienced.  If I it were possible to rate the transcriptionist’s comment with a plus, this comment would warrant it!

So hey, color me embarrassed!  I think I may have been speaking to a couple of consultants on the phone during my dictation.  It was a busy day of admissions. 

However, I’m not known for my skill at dictation.  It has been my consistent observation that virtually every chart I dictate has a blank that I later have to fill in by hand.  Maybe I mumble, maybe I hold the phone too far from my mouth.  I know that I have a habit of speaking too fast.  Combined with my native West Virginia inflections and my adopted South Carolina ones, it’s a prescription for unintelligable communications.  My heart goes out to the ladies and gentlemen who have to decode my rambling.

Still, I feel I have to respond to some of the comments.  First, I’d like to say thanks for the term ‘dictator.’  While I understand it was being used in the context of a medical chart, it does give me a feeling of power, a sense of total dominion, that I actually don’t feel in my day to day life.  If I were a dictator, practicing modern medicine, rest assured heads would roll.  But that’s another discussion altogether.

Now, regarding the allegation that I leave intent to the imagination of the hearer: I am a writer.  Imagination is very important to me!  If the hearer or reader finds himself or herself transported to a realm in which they can try to picture the scene in the ER, or where they have the singular delight of trying to construct mental scenarios of why patients did some of the tragically silly things I report, then so much the better.  Imagination is useful and powerful.  And frankly, imagination is what I frequently employ when the history and physical are so lacking in reality or actual findings.

But most important, before closing, I want to say this:

I ap..gize for any…I may have….  Sometimes, banana (?) I get comfuzzled in the ring/rang fluffy.  Of course, if I cood have brean any cleaner, it wouldn’t have hurried along, but the bunnies were running in the field (!) before Mr. Johnson fell down yesterday at 3 PM resulting in an intrauterine pregnancy which, when Pompeii was covered in lava made the transcriptionist appear to feel, or be, angry, whose vital signs were stable, or unremarkable, and not psychotic or delusional.

I remain, yours, confusedly and with obfuscation,

Egwart Leeapt, ND

Malpractice and Suicide (July EMN column)

We doctors are experts at death. I always used to say, ‘don’t mess with an ER doctor; we know where all the important parts are and where to stick sharp things!’ (ER nurses tend to talk about potassium and insulin).

Turns out, it’s actually true. We are dangerous. Doctors are good at killing; but mostly themselves. Male physicians, it turns out, have up to three times greater relative risk of suicide than the general population, and females up to six times! And when we do it, we do it right. We know the best pills to take and how to take them and we know exactly where the bullet should go.

We’ve known for a long time that doctors have lots of stresses that lead to suicide. But I guess I didn’t realize until fairly recently how much malpractice litigation plays into physicians’ thoughts of self-harm.

I’ve heard different numbers about how much more likely we are to kill ourselves after malpractice suits. But statistics aside, it appears to be a sizeable increase over our baseline tendency to hurry ourselves into eternity. That is, when we get sued, we think about killing ourselves more than ever. Sometimes it’s when the suit is brought, sometimes as it’s being litigated, sometimes after a judgment or settlement. Regardless of the timing, a malpractice suit does something to us.

I suppose it’s easy to see. We spend years and years learning to be competent, meticulous, cautious. We study and study, and become terribly upset over grades that would leave our non-medical friends ecstatic. We spend years face down in books, absorbing everything to get into medical school, and to survive it.

Then what happens? In the course of seeing patients, we make a mistake, or are accused of making a mistake. But we don’t like to make mistakes. We’re told we mustn’t, shouldn’t, can’t make mistakes. So the first strike against our psyches is the error or perception of error.

Second, we’re told that the alleged error caused harm. Holy Smokes! What about ‘primum non nocere?’ First do no harm! We might have hurt someone! We try to never hurt anyone. We struggle to anesthetize wounds and anesthetize people. We don’t want to cause so much as the pain of a needle-stick. We slather patients with local anesthetic creams and pump them with sedatives to avoid the discomfort of a splinter removal, or the anxiety of draining an abscess. When we find that we may have hurt someone, or Heaven forbid, killed someone, we’re devastated. It flies in the face of everything we have been taught to do. It is the antithesis of what we hoped to be.

Then third, we learn that our alleged error, and alleged harm, will be the subject of that little bit of public theater known as ‘litigation.’ We’ll be hauled before attorneys for depositions, before administrators for answers and before juries and judges for evaluation of our decisions. We may face financial punishment. These days, we may even face civil or criminal punishment, or loss of our practice privileges. And it will all end up in the local paper.

Subsequently, we’ll suffer the quiet indignity of having other physicians look at us and whisper, if only to themselves, ‘I would never have done that!’ We know that we’ll be judged by our colleagues at least as harshly as we are by the public. The case may even show up, in some veiled fashion, at grand rounds, or at morbidity and mortality conference.

For physicians in less equitable practices, even the hint of litigation may result in some little talk, some warning, some suggestion not to do anything like that again ‘or else.’

So in the end, all of the effort and compassion, the hard work and motivation, the hopes of a spotless career, are derailed, even if temporarily, by one event; by one error. And we fear that we will wear a scarlet letter ‘M’ for malpractice for the rest of our lives.

For many physicians, medicine is the single most important validation of their lives. It is the thing that has defined them throughout adulthood, and that they intended to define them forever. ‘Doctor, physician, healer, professional.’ These are the words that come to mind. Malpractice, however, replaces them with ‘assailant, defendant, killer, quack’. Worse, the lawsuit often uses words like ‘willful, malicious, premeditated,’ in describing the evil actions of what is obviously an evil doctor. (Even as the plaintiff’s attorney says ‘it’s not personal, you know, it’s just business!’)

So malpractice takes that validation and, if we aren’t careful, shatters it into a million pieces. Threatening loss of work, loss of money and livelihood, loss of reputation, it ends in loss of self-image, loss of self-worth. And for all too many physicians, that loss compounds the other stresses of practice, and makes death seem a reasonable, even desirable, alternative. And so, after a period of sadness and detachment, the stored pills are swallowed, the chamber checked for a live round, and a life of great achievement and service is brought to an abrupt end.

But it’s so unnecessary. Brothers and sisters, we are good people. And the reason that malpractice makes physicians consider suicide is that we care, perhaps too much, about our careers. It is a high and amazing calling, medicine. It gives us the chance to support ourselves and our families and to do so much good in a world that is so bad! Still, at the end of the day, it is still a job. And our lives are worth so much more than a job alone.

As a profession, and as individuals, as colleagues and friends of other physicians, we have to reclaim our hearts. We have to reclaim our identity and worth, separate from hospitals and clinics, procedures and incomes, emergency departments and positions. We have to deny anyone the power to take our worth from us. No attorney or lawsuit, no plaintiff, however genuinely or falsely injured, should have the power to make us contemplate ending our own lives.

The truth is, we will make mistakes. We may even cause harm. But we practice an imperfect science in an imperfect world on imperfect people. It is fraught with potential errors and disasters every day that we walk through the door to work, every time we touch a sick or injured human.

But the greatest mistake we can make has nothing to do with missed diagnoses or medication doses, botched procedures or wound infections. The greatest mistake is to believe our worth as individuals has anything to do with any of that.

Lawsuit or no, everyone reading this is loved; loved by parent or child, by spouse or friend, by lover or sibling, or by someone who loves you from afar, and has yet to reveal it. Everyone reading this is loved by God, who knew you were going to make the very mistake you made, and loves you anyway.

Let’s reach out to everyone who gets sued. Give them a handshake or embrace, a friendly smile and an understanding ear. Remind them of all the good they have done, and of all the good they have yet to do. And we should tell them the stories of our own lawsuits so they won’t feel so utterly alone. As individuals and as a profession, we need to stop making malpractice litigation seem like the worst thing in the whole world of medicine. Because in the end, it’s nowhere near as horrible as having the world denied a good doctor through suicide.

Please see my website, www.edwinleap.com, for further comments on this column, on my experiences with litigation, and on the inestimable value of each and every human.

Focus on the Family article

My thanks to Dr. James Dobson for graciously reprinting one of my pieces in this month’s Focus on the Family newsletter.

Here’s the address for the post:

http://www.focusonthefamily.com/docstudy/newsletters/A000000920.cfm

The article concerned Vacation Bible School, and what I learned as a physician by working in VBS last summer.

I hope you look it up and find it interesting.

Sincerely,

Edwin

What’s the point?

What’s the point?

The radio at the desk carried the same story as always, in faintly static words, as if to echo the faintly static thoughts of everyone involved:  ‘25-year-old female patient with suicide attempt.’  She had ingested a bottle of something that wasn’t quite dangerous enough; or maybe she superficially applied a razor to her wrist, in such a way that everything important beneath her pale skin remained intact, properly flexing and pulsatile.  I don’t remember which it was, or if it was anything other than ‘I want to drive my car off a bridge’ or ‘I just want to go to sleep and die’.

What I do remember is that the excellent and caring nurse who took the report turned around and said what many physicians and nurses think at some point: ‘Why don’t we let her?  Who cares?  If she wants to die, we should let her!’

I thought about that later; thought about all of the time and money and effort.  About the miles of stitches and staples placed in wounds that men and women inflict on themselves.  I tried to imagine the uncounted tubes of charcoal we pour down thousands of feet of nasogastric tubes every weekend, every year.  I remembered the many interactions I have had with psychiatric facilities in the night, all to rescue the people who said they wanted to die.  Why do we do it?

Maybe physicians and nurses and paramedics do it because it is expected. After all, if we don’t do ‘the right thing’, there is the threat of malpractice suits and the stigma of not meeting the ‘standard of care’. Or maybe we just don’t want to feel guilty, as we know we will, for letting another human take their own life.  Those are all parts of the puzzle.  But I believe there may be more.

I hope that most nurses and doctors recognize that the minds of those patients are diseased, and that suicidal thoughts and actions, like hallucinations or delusions, are the symptoms of diseased brains.  The psychic equivalent of jaundice or murmurs or deformed limbs.  Even as these patients drive physicians to distraction, even as we struggle with the ethics of self-determination, on some level we know that a brain is an organ, and all organs are potentially diseased.  We work pretty hard to save those with heart disease, emphysema, diabetes and terrible injuries, so maybe we know that diseased minds deserve the same effort.

But everyone can have a hard time with that.  After years of controlling our lives, working hard, suppressing emotions and personal interest, it seems a little ridiculous that someone else couldn’t do the same.  That someone couldn’t see tomorrow as a little brighter.  It seems odd to physicians and nurses, secure as we generally are in position, influence, financial security and respect, that someone else could see the world as simply unmanageable and intolerable.  How could they think life was less than wonderful, good and full of meaning?  Maybe that’s why they can be so frustrating to our ‘type A’ personalities, what with their empty pill bottles and lolling eyes, their tearful families and crumpled, dirty suicide notes, with their bleeding arms and botched gunshot wounds.  We think, ‘I would never do that!’  So too many doctors and nurses wonder why bother to try at all.  The world of the suicidal is too far removed from most of our lives.

Beyond the fact that most of us just can’t relate, and beyond guilt, malpractice and ‘duty’, there lies another reason for we try to reach the suicidal.  A reason born in the lives of the ones who try to cut and ingest their way to the morgue.  After seeing enough people in my 13 years of practice to date, I have a few ideas about why we struggle year after year with so many patients’ attempts to end their lives.  It’s because I believe that maybe we can sense, if we pay close attention, just how very much pain they are enduring.

The truth, that hopefully most of us see, is that our patients are suicidal because they were abused physically and sexually, as adults and children, and no one has ever told them it wasn’t their fault.  The only way they see to end the guilt, and oblate the re-entrant path of painful images, is to die.  Our patients are suicidal because their families gave them diseases of the mind that passed through the confluence of DNA, through the womb, and through the families where they grew up in constant chaos.  Many of them can’t afford medication or psychiatric care.  Death is an escape from diseases they inherited like the mark of Cain, and from the ties that bind them to others just as diseased.            They are suicidal because they lost parents or children, spouses or lovers, friends or even pets who were the only things that gave them any hope or affection in a cold world.  They want to die because tomorrow only seems more bleak than today, and because with no hope of vacation or shopping trip, no hope of education or achievement, death seems as good as life.

The suicidal come to us because they are slaves to drugs and alcohol, slaves to sex, slaves to food, society’s expectations, cruel families and misery.  They know that death is a kind of liberation from the chains that bind them in every way.  And the suicidal come to us because no one has ever said to them, ‘Whatever you do or don’t do, or did, you still have worth to me.  I love you.’ The suicidal are suicidal because they either have no one to love them, or because they cannot believe that they are worthy of love.

Why do we do it?  Now I know why we do it.  In the end, even the most committed suicidal patients are seldom really suicidal; they’re only desperate for some anesthesia of the heart, and death is the only permanent sedative they know. We know that all of the thoughts that tell them to kill themselves are lies and deceptions of disordered minds and broken hearts.

As for me, I’ll keep pushing the charcoal and talking to the counselors and sewing the wounds.  And God help me, I’ll try not to act angry or annoyed.  Because if my child ever reaches that place, and I can’t be there to fight for them, I want someone to ask, not ‘Why do we do it?’, but rather, ‘Why would you do it, my dear?  Let me pull you back from the edge and we’ll talk a while.  There are other ways to take away the pain.’

Tyranny of the elderly

This is a column I put in the Greenville News a few years ago. I think it’s still relevant, and wanted to put it out again. It concerns just how mean folks can be when they get old and grumpy. Not demented, mind you, just mean.

.

Tyrants come in all shapes and sizes. We are accustomed to their presence in history. The very word fills our imagination with faces, burnt into our minds by movies, books, documentaries and the stories of friends and family who faced their power in war. Ask someone for examples of tyrants and many names will come up, like Hitler, Stalin, Mao or more recently Saddam. Their tyranny was famous, remarkable in intensity and in the sheer volume of blood with which their names were written on history. We know them.

But sometimes we forget that tyranny can be focused more intimately, in a scale so small that it passes by unnoticed. In fact, tyranny can be the chief characteristic of a relationship between two people. And even though it does not make the history books, even though it escapes our notice because the bruises may be small, the scars psychic, this tyranny is no less life altering to its victim.

Tyranny, says my abused and rumpled Oxford desk dictionary, can be “the cruel and arbitrary use of authority”. It does not include any requirement for numbers of persons involved, nor any description of the types of authority or cruelty invoked by tyrants. So, I believe, tyranny is most prevalent in families.


We see it in the terrors of domestic violence. The news brings us shootings, arrests and abductions. Occasionally we catch a glimpse of a woman, or even man, whose physical wounds are the result of an event described with mumbled words, averted eyes and silence. Their lives are ruled by pain, randomly applied by their tyrant.


Worse still is the tyranny of parents who beat, who burn, who do unspeakable acts to the most helpless citizens of their homes. They come to believe that their authority gives them the right to harm, neglect or speak cruelly to their little ones. This touches us in the place where we all remain children for our entire lives.

But as relationships go, another tyranny is seldom recognized, seldom even admitted by its victims. It is the oppression of adult children by aging, adult parents. Most commonly, it is practiced by those who are frustrated and dissatisfied by life. In their elderly years they believe they have a right to treat their children as slaves. I’m not writing against the elderly, by any means. I see and care for the elderly every day that I work, and respect them enormously. Much of my life, from childhood, has been an intense interaction with elderly men and women who loved and cared for me and taught me what the Bible meant when it said, “gray hair is a crown of splendor”. Most of them have gone on to their real crowns eternal. But I have seen others, in practice and my own life, who live their later years as if the only way to endure their own unhappiness were to inflict it on their daughters and sons.


These men and women often use the Bible as their defense. “Honor your father and mother”, they quote freely and frequently. But any other mention of mercy, wisdom or kindness escapes them, and their grown children face decades of life with constant late night phone calls regarding fabricated physical ailments, exaggerated real ones or any other excuse to pull the puppet strings they attach to their children.


Too many good, caring adult children contend every day with visits that would depress a saint. Many, who invite a parent to live with them, find their entire household dragged into a constant state of depression. These long-suffering, devoted offspring cannot travel or ‘illness’ suddenly appears in their parent. Their marriages struggle or dissolve. Their own children stay away or visit only briefly. The later years of their own lives, which could be full of satisfaction and joy, become mired down with misery, and punctuated with threats of suicide, comparisons with better children or twice daily recollections of how the tyrant suffered for his or her children; a walk down memory lane planted with land mines of guilt.


I have seen it up close, personally; it is horrible to behold. What a pity that for a few older adults, life confers entitlement rather than wisdom. How tragic that in their age they do not enjoy their descendants, or show them the virtue of life well lived, but choose to spend their final years tormenting the ones they should love best.

On free health care and Michael Moore

Okay, I can’t claim to have seen Sicko.  So I’m not writing to condemn it, or to slam Mr. Moore.  Whatever I may think of his political bent, he does have a way of rattling cages.  I can’t fault the guy for that.

I have, however, been reading some reviews of the movie.  And one of the things that comes through is the way that reviewers believe what Mr. Moore is saying:  everyone would be happier if health-care were free.  And who could deny that reality?  Free!  Everything that’s free is better!

‘Take money out of the equation.’  ‘Make health-care a thing that doesn’t depend on money,’ etc., etc.

I agree.  My ten-year-old son, Seth, has insulin dependent diabetes.  I appreciate the fact that my job allows me to give him access to excellent care.  He wears an insulin pump, which is an enormous advance over multiple injections each day.  His diabetes is going well, and he has the promise of a long life.  Money makes that possible, and for those without money, the possibilities are fewer.  Free care would be a wonderful thing.  I care for patients every day who can’t afford to pay their bills.  They could use some free care for their illnesses, too. 

It does seem an inequity that people struggle to get health care for purely financial reasons.  America has tried to patch that problem in various (usually ineffective) ways, from Medicaid to Medicare, from EMTALA to Social Security/Disability.

I suspect that we’re on our way to a national health insurance system, if not an entirely socialized system. 

I see advantages and disadvantages if this happens.  I suspect that for me, as an emergency physician, it will not change my income.  I’ll make less per patient, but be paid for everyone I see.  I’ll do OK, at least until someone figures out that I’m doing OK, and the government decreases my payments. 

That’s how I see the future of health-care.  Because it is so important, many people believe that it simply has to be free to be equitable for everyone.  See, necessary things are always free, right?  Like housing and food.  All you do is go to the store and ask for it, and you get food!  It’s a wonderful system we have!  Wait, that’s not right, those things aren’t free at all!

Well that’s all I want to point out. Even health-care in the purest idealized socialist system, in the most European, Marxist based, Castro-modeled, academic leftist dream-scape, won’t be free.  Get this:  health care can’t be free. 

It can be free to the people who receive it, provided they are low enough on the economic scale.  But to anyone with money, health care will cost something.  It will feel good to have those surgeries and prescriptions handed out without a bill. No question.  But it will come at the cost of very high taxes.  The money will come from the government, but governments don’t produce…they consume.  And what they consume is productivity in the form of taxes. 

If care in the US is socialized, look for very high income taxes, in the 50% range for most everyone with a decent income.  Maybe that’s where we have to go.  Maybe that’s the wave of the future.  I know many folks who will benefit enormously from that system.  I know some who won’t, and who will feel no desire to be financially productive when so much of their income is going to a federal program. 

I don’t know the answer.  Some days I’m ready to socialize it all, to make it easier across the board.  So everyone gets their antibiotics and procedures.  Some days I want to return to the days of McCartyism and sound a red scare at anyone who wants to offer free anything to some of the societal drags that abuse the system year after year, and in the process steal from me and from my partners.

But whatever way I swing, one thing remains true.  Free health care will never be free.  It will always cost something, and that thing it costs will be money.  And make no mistake about it. 

So however Michael Moore may present it, and however we all want to remove money from the equation, it will always be there, green and silver, staring back at us and demanding to be included in all our plans.

 

Ed 

Obituary

I’ll call her Tina.  Tina was once a regular fixture of our emergency department. 

Tina was found dead at home.  She was in her 40′s.  Tina loved drugs.  She would come to us at all hours in hopes of receiving a prescription for a narcotic.  They were, it seems, her life.

Tina injured herself for drugs.  She asked others to obtain them for her.  Her boyfriends stole drugs for her. 

Tina’s children were removed from her, because of drugs.  Tina was, in every sense, addicted to pain medicine. 

What else she used, I don’t recall.  Doubtless, she was a chemical lab on legs.  I suspect she had tried almost everything she could find on the streets, as well as whatever she managed get from friends, family and assorted physicians. 

I remember Tina.  I looked at her face now and then and thought, ‘she could be beautiful!’  I knew someone who went to high school with her, and he confirmed my suspicion.  That beneath smudged, over-used eye-shadow and rough, scarred skin, beneath used up veins and broken bones, was a woman who would have made us stop to look twice, in another time or place, another life.

Somewhere along the line, she became a lost soul. Somewhere, sometime, she gave up hope.  She surrendered what the rest of us dream of; home, joy, prosperity, health, family.  She surrendered it for the feeling that certain molecules elicited in her brain.

She surrendered the children she bore, she surrendered her body, her mind, her life, all for the rush.  Or maybe all for the anesthesia from some pain we never quite understood.

See, if anyone needs to know what the word ‘broken’ means, Tina was its definition.  She was broken incarnate. 

This old world is broken, and so are we.  Tina was just a few degrees further off course than the rest of us…but only a few, so I can’t judge her too harshly. 

May God receive her as a broken child. 

I don’t know what Tina believed.  I know that God is  just and merciful.  Maybe, somewhere beneath the mess of her body and mind, behind the desperate addiction to drugs, her soul cried out to him for help.  Maybe, in the worst cases, that’s all it takes.  The desire of a child; the desire to be rescued.

I hope that I see her, on that day, that great and terrible day, standing at the side of Jesus.  I hope that when I say ‘Hi Tina, it’s me, Doctor Leap!’ That she fixes me with a sweet smile, and turns her head a little to the side, her brows wrinkled over clear, questioning eyes.  I hope that Jesus puts his hands gently over her ears and whispers to me, ‘She can’t remember any of that…I wiped it all away and she’s brand new!’  Maybe I won’t remember any of it either.

Tina is survived by children who never really knew her, by family who lost her too soon, and by a host of people who helped her fall from grace. 

May God have mercy on all of them.

We won’t miss her as she was; but the world is a little less for the loss of what she was meant to be.  The devil will pay for that one when his time comes round.

Edwin